<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Don&#039;t Disconnect Us &#187; Digital</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dontdisconnect.us/tag/digital/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dontdisconnect.us</link>
	<description>Fighting against Lord Mandelson&#039;s filesharing proposals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 16:28:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>&#8216;Why does Mandelson favour the Analogue Economy over the Digital?&#8217; &#8211; Guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.dontdisconnect.us/why-does-mandelson-favour-the-analogue-economy-over-the-digital-guardian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dontdisconnect.us/why-does-mandelson-favour-the-analogue-economy-over-the-digital-guardian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Don&#39;t Disconnect Us</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Economy Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lord mandelson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dontdisconnect.us/?p=407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Britons&#8217; love for filesharing is here to stay – and Peter Mandelson had better get used to it.
There&#8217;s a lot to hate about Peter Mandelson&#8217;s controversial Digital Economy Bill, but there&#8217;s one provision that perfectly captures the absolute, reality-denying absurdity of the whole enterprise. That titbit is the provision that holds the Bill&#8217;s most drastic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Britons&#8217; love for filesharing is here to stay – and Peter Mandelson had better get used to it.</p>
<blockquote><p>There&#8217;s a lot to hate about Peter Mandelson&#8217;s controversial Digital Economy Bill, but there&#8217;s one provision that perfectly captures the absolute, reality-denying absurdity of the whole enterprise. That titbit is the provision that holds the Bill&#8217;s most drastic measures in reserve, only to be used if Britain&#8217;s illegal filesharing doesn&#8217;t drop off by 70% within a year of the main part of the Bill coming into force.</p>
<p>The idea that, at some time in the future, the volume of unauthorised copying will somehow drop off at all (let alone by an astounding 70%), is, frankly, barking. For that to happen, Britain&#8217;s general capacity for copying would have to decline faster than the increase in the British desire to make unauthorised copies.</p></blockquote>
<p>The <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/nov/26/digital-economy-file-sharing-mandelson">Guardian</a> has the full article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dontdisconnect.us/why-does-mandelson-favour-the-analogue-economy-over-the-digital-guardian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
